Every single one of these doomerism articles is a) 100% bullshit and b) is put there to make the technology seem magical when it's just matrix multiplication

Will your butter knife kill off humanity? Cutlery scientists and politicians wrestle with risks of butter knives

Getting way more use out of this image than I could have imagined back when a younger and more hopeful version of me saved it to my phone.

"There are lots of reasons why AI is not acceptable in our community, so there is no reasonable argument for why you’re using it as far as we’re concerned."
https://britishfantasysociety.org/its-a-cheat-code-clarifying-the-bfs-stance-on-generative-ai/

"While Buckmaster and Alpöge were finalizing their own results, they learned that “information about our progress had been passed to OpenAI.” When they contacted OpenAI, they were told that OpenAI had already achieved a full proof of the central problem. But when they asked follow-up questions about when OpenAI had begun its research into the problem and how much human input was involved, the answers became more evasive.

“It emerged that an entire team had been working on the problem,” Buckmaster said, “and that an insane amount of compute had been used…. Eventually, it was agreed that [the first prompt] had been sent in the past few days, after information about our work had reached OpenAI.”

If true, that would suggest the OpenAI team had become convinced that Buckmaster and Alpöge’s approach was the right one, and decided to use its material advantage in computing resources to reach a formal proof first."

https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/openai-fought-dirty-on-career-making-math-problem-says-nyu-mathematician/

#AI #GenerativeAI #LLMs #OpenAI #Astra #GPT #Math #Mathematics

AI is for fucking losers.

It appears that Tristan Buckmaster raising alarms that AI corporations may have snooped on their research so the companies could throw compute at developing proofs for, and gain credit for, advancements in the Navier-Stokes equations. OpenAI then threw a massive amount of compute at the problem, and seemed to try to coerce Tristan into getting credit for it: https://cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/statement.pdf

> I said that if OpenAI released its result in the way proposed I would go public with what happened. The reply was, “Why would you ruin your career?” I replied that I am an academic, and asked why he thought going public would ruin my career. The reply was, “If you don’t want me to be nice, then I don’t have to be nice.”

RE: https://reseauculture.fr/@MuseeOrsay/117236446301216272

Bienvenue au Musée d'Orsay sur Mastodon 🎉

Ya pas à dire, l'équipe de @cercle fait des choses fantastiques ❤️

My kingdom for a Remember Me checkbox that actually Remembers Me

The other day, I wanted to see if alcohol-free port existed. The top search link went to a page of the 20 best alcohol-free ports! Except none of them were port, they were all spirits (not even other fortified wines). The ‘AI’ summary described a fictional process for removing alcohol from port and had two citations, neither of which supported the claim. The next 30 pages were all LLM slop that talked about what port is for a long time before saying that there’s no alcohol-free version.

I have been using the web since the mid ‘90s and it has never been this bad. Anyone advocating for ‘AI’ is advocating for a future where this damage is spread to all facets of life.

"No, I didn't plagiarise it, I simply Found It In My Training Data"

My kind of café

"{project} is now using LLMs" is the new milkshake duck

Alt text:

It has recently come to my attention that Meta is labelling several of my posts as ‘Likely made using AI’. What you see on my website and social media is 100% human-created art. No AI tools or generators are, and never will be, used at any stage of my creative process.

Friends, you may have seen this but if not, sharing:

"The LLM-generated proof hinges on a particular mathematical argument that it presented as its own but that actually first appeared in a 2016 paper by Miller and a collaborator."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/openais-latest-math-breakthroughs-commit-research-misconduct-experts-say/

"do you see it?"

it's toading

"loading?"

did I stutter

William Faulkner: The past is never dead. It’s not even past.

William Gibson: The future is already here—it’s just not very evenly distributed.

Me: Jesus Christ. No wonder I don't know what day it is.

Secret Panel HERE 🤜♥🤛 https://patreon.com/mrlovenstein/posts/dapper-dudes-131393060