Well this is one way to incentivise peer review for conferences
"irresponsible reviewers ... may become ineligible to submit, resubmit, or commit their work to ACL venues for the duration of the next review cycle"
Some individuals are biased by having good taste. That poses a challenge for schemes of aggregating opinions. More in my latest newsletter:
It is 13:07 and I am arguing with my AI agent about experiment design ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
In an era of lies, misdirection and general galloping idiocy, there is a simple pleasure in choosing the word which means exactly what you want, in exactly the right place